Fuel Economy Of Roof Rack Vs Luggage Box

5 9 l 100 km approx.

Fuel economy of roof rack vs luggage box.

For comparison the additional fuel consumption caused by roof racks is about six times larger than anticipated fuel savings from fuel cell vehicles and 40 percent of anticipated fuel savings. A good hitch cargo carrier is the thule transporter combi th665c. He compared the gas mileage of his car at 54 7 mph 88 kph with 1 no roof racks 2 an empty roof rack and 3 a mountain bike on the roof rack. 40 mpg roof mounted thule xtender 739 ski carrier with skis.

Beyond that the two items tested with the least impact on gas mileage were the paddle board and thule luggage carrier both of which caused about a 19 percent decrease in fuel economy or 5 5. But that s where you ve found a dilemma. 5 6 l 100 km approx. In fact it significantly cuts your highway mileage all the time it s installed whether there s weight up there or not.

Adding a roof rack and subsequent cargo to the roof of your vehicle will affect it s overall aerodynamics. For some people the. 42 mpg roof rack with thule dynamic 800 aerodynamic cargo box. The empty roof rack had a nearly 2 percent impact on fuel economy which translates to a little more than three quarters of a gallon of gas.

He found that compared to the baseline of no roof rack the empty rack reduced his mpg by 12 7 and the roof rack with a bicycle reduced it by a whooping 27 3. Hitch racks by the time you get the whole family loaded up in your vehicle there s no room for all the luggage and gear. This results in lowered fuel economy and more drag on your vehicle. That s why you ve decided to invest in a cargo carrier.

Mileage went from 41 mpg at 65 mph to 40 mpg. Hitch racks or roof racks which one should you choose. It holds up to 13 cubic feet and 150 lbs. Honda cr v fuel consumption on motorway freeway box on the roof and full luggage fix and drive.

6 0 l 100 km approx. Fuel economy mpg review fill up costs. Adding any rooftop carrier cargo box or ski rack doesn t come free.